AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 12GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 48GB

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot delivers 75% more FP16 throughput than the Radeon RX 7700 XT (123 vs 70 TFLOPS dense). The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot also carries 36 GB more memory (48 GB vs 12 GB).

Radeon RX 7700 XT: RDNA 3, 2023 Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: RDNA 3, 2024
FP16 dense lead
+75%
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: 123 vs 70 TFLOPS
VRAM
12 vs 48 GB
36 GB more for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Bandwidth
432 GB/s vs 864 GB/s
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot moves data faster
TDP
245 W vs 295 W
Radeon RX 7700 XT draws 50 W less

Specifications

Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Architecture
RDNA 3RDNA 3
Launch Year
20232024
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
VRAM
12 GB48 GB
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s864 GB/s
TDP
245 W295 W
Process Node
5nm5nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
35.2 TFlops 61.3 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
70.3 TFlops 123.0 TFlops
FP8
No verified data available No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
70.3 TFlops 123.0 TFlops

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer part: RDNA 3, launched in 2024, against the Radeon RX 7700 XT's RDNA 3 from 2023. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Dense throughput for the Radeon RX 7700 XT against the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: FP32 35 vs 61 TFLOPS, FP16 70 vs 123 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 12 GB against 48 GB, fed at 432 GB/s versus 864 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 245 W for the Radeon RX 7700 XT and 295 W for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. At FP32 that works out to 0.14 against 0.21 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Radeon RX 7700 XT faster than the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?

At FP16 precision the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 123 TFLOPS dense against 70 TFLOPS for the Radeon RX 7700 XT. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the Radeon RX 7700 XT or the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 48 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB for the Radeon RX 7700 XT. Memory bandwidth is 432 GB/s for the Radeon RX 7700 XT and 864 GB/s for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.

How much power do the Radeon RX 7700 XT and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draw?

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is rated at 245 W TDP and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot at 295 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.