Intel Arc Pro A60 12GB vs Intel Arc A770 16GB
The Arc A770 delivers 96% more FP32 throughput than the Arc Pro A60 (20 vs 10 TFLOPS dense). The Arc A770 also carries 4 GB more memory (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Intel Arc Pro A60 12GB
Full specs →Intel Arc A770 16GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The Arc Pro A60 is the newer part: Alchemist, launched in 2023, against the Arc A770's Alchemist from 2022. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Dense throughput for the Arc Pro A60 against the Arc A770: FP32 10 vs 20 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 12 GB against 16 GB, fed at 384 GB/s versus 560 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 130 W for the Arc Pro A60 and 225 W for the Arc A770. At FP32 that works out to 0.08 against 0.09 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro A60 faster than the Arc A770?
At FP32 precision the Arc A770 reaches 20 TFLOPS dense against 10 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro A60. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Arc Pro A60 or the Arc A770?
The Arc A770 carries 16 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB for the Arc Pro A60. Memory bandwidth is 384 GB/s for the Arc Pro A60 and 560 GB/s for the Arc A770.
How much power do the Arc Pro A60 and the Arc A770 draw?
The Arc Pro A60 is rated at 130 W TDP and the Arc A770 at 225 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc A770 is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.