Intel Arc Pro A60 12GB vs Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB
The Arc Pro A60 delivers 2.0x the FP32 throughput of the Arc Pro A40 (10 vs 5 TFLOPS dense). The Arc Pro A60 also carries 6 GB more memory (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Intel Arc Pro A60 12GB
Full specs →Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The Arc Pro A60 is the newer part: Alchemist, launched in 2023, against the Arc Pro A40's Alchemist from 2022. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Dense throughput for the Arc Pro A60 against the Arc Pro A40: FP32 10 vs 5 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 12 GB against 6 GB, fed at 384 GB/s versus 192 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 130 W for the Arc Pro A60 and 50 W for the Arc Pro A40. At FP32 that works out to 0.08 against 0.10 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro A60 faster than the Arc Pro A40?
At FP32 precision the Arc Pro A60 reaches 10 TFLOPS dense against 5 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro A40. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Arc Pro A60 or the Arc Pro A40?
The Arc Pro A60 carries 12 GB of VRAM versus 6 GB for the Arc Pro A40. Memory bandwidth is 384 GB/s for the Arc Pro A60 and 192 GB/s for the Arc Pro A40.
How much power do the Arc Pro A60 and the Arc Pro A40 draw?
The Arc Pro A60 is rated at 130 W TDP and the Arc Pro A40 at 50 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc Pro A40 is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.