Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB vs Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB
The Arc Pro B60 delivers 15% more FP32 throughput than the Arc Pro B50 (12 vs 11 TFLOPS dense). The Arc Pro B60 also carries 8 GB more memory (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
Full specs →Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2025: the Arc Pro B60 on Battlemage and the Arc Pro B50 on Battlemage.
Dense throughput for the Arc Pro B60 against the Arc Pro B50: FP32 12 vs 11 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 24 GB against 16 GB, fed at 456 GB/s versus 224 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 200 W for the Arc Pro B60 and 70 W for the Arc Pro B50. At FP32 that works out to 0.06 against 0.15 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro B60 faster than the Arc Pro B50?
At FP32 precision the Arc Pro B60 reaches 12 TFLOPS dense against 11 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B50. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Arc Pro B60 or the Arc Pro B50?
The Arc Pro B60 carries 24 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB for the Arc Pro B50. Memory bandwidth is 456 GB/s for the Arc Pro B60 and 224 GB/s for the Arc Pro B50.
How much power do the Arc Pro B60 and the Arc Pro B50 draw?
The Arc Pro B60 is rated at 200 W TDP and the Arc Pro B50 at 70 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc Pro B50 is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.