NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB vs NVIDIA GH200 96GB HBM3

The H200 and the GH200 deliver near-identical FP8 throughput (1,979 vs 1,979 TFLOPS dense). The H200 also carries 45 GB more memory (141 GB vs 96 GB).

H200: Hopper, 2024 GH200: Hopper, 2023
VRAM
141 vs 96 GB
45 GB more for the H200
Bandwidth
4.8 TB/s vs 4.0 TB/s
H200 moves data faster
TDP
700 W vs 1.0 kW
H200 draws 300 W less

Specifications

H200
GH200
Architecture
HopperHopper
Launch Year
20242023
Form Factor
SXMSXM
VRAM
141 GB96 GB
Memory Bandwidth
4.8 TB/s4.0 TB/s
TDP
700 W1.0 kW
Process Node
4nm4nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

H200
GH200
FP64
34.0 TFlops 34.0 TFlops
FP32
67.0 TFlops 67.0 TFlops
FP16
990.0 TFlops
1979.0 TFLOPS sparse
990.0 TFlops
1979.0 TFLOPS sparse
BF16
990.0 TFlops
1979.0 TFLOPS sparse
990.0 TFlops
1979.0 TFLOPS sparse
FP8
1979.0 TFlops
3958.0 TFLOPS sparse
1979.0 TFlops
3958.0 TFLOPS sparse
INT8
1979.0 TFlops
3958.0 TOPS sparse
1979.0 TFlops
3958.0 TOPS sparse

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The H200 is the newer part: Hopper, launched in 2024, against the GH200's Hopper from 2023. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Dense throughput for the H200 against the GH200: FP64 34 vs 34 TFLOPS, FP32 67 vs 67 TFLOPS, FP16 990 vs 990 TFLOPS, FP8 1,979 vs 1,979 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 141 GB against 96 GB, fed at 4.8 TB/s versus 4.0 TB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 700 W for the H200 and 1.0 kW for the GH200. At FP32 that works out to 0.10 against 0.07 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the H200 faster than the GH200?

They are close on paper: both deliver about 1,979 TFLOPS of dense FP8 throughput. Memory, bandwidth, and power are the deciding differences.

Which has more memory, the H200 or the GH200?

The H200 carries 141 GB of VRAM versus 96 GB for the GH200. Memory bandwidth is 4.8 TB/s for the H200 and 4.0 TB/s for the GH200.

How much power do the H200 and the GH200 draw?

The H200 is rated at 700 W TDP and the GH200 at 1.0 kW. On FP32 throughput per watt, the H200 is the more efficient part.

Can I rent the H200 or the GH200 in the cloud?

Yes. Live cloud listings tracked by Flopper start at $2.00 per GPU hour. The rental pricing section on this page lists current providers and rates for both GPUs.

Where to Rent

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
DataCrunch
1× H200 SXM Spot $2.00 4h ago View →
Nebius
1× H200 SXM Spot $2.45 4h ago View →
CoreWeave
8× H200 SXM Spot $2.62 4h ago View →
RunPod
1× H200 SXM Community $3.59 4h ago View →
Hyperstack
1× H200 SXM $3.99 4h ago View →
Together AI
1× H200 SXM Reserved $3.99 4h ago View →
DataCrunch
1× H200 SXM $4.00 4h ago View →
Crusoe
1× H200 SXM $4.29 4h ago View →
DigitalOcean
1× H200 SXM $4.47 4h ago View →
DigitalOcean
8× H200 SXM $4.47 4h ago View →
Nebius
1× H200 SXM $4.50 4h ago View →
RunPod
1× H200 SXM $4.59 4h ago View →
Together AI
1× H200 SXM $5.99 4h ago View →
CoreWeave
8× H200 SXM $6.30 4h ago View →
Oracle Cloud (OCI)
1× H200 SXM $10.00 4h ago View →
Microsoft Azure
8× H200 SXM $10.60 10h ago View →
All H200 listings and price history →

NVIDIA GH200 96GB HBM3

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
CoreWeave
1× GH200 96GB HBM3 $6.50 4h ago View →
All GH200 listings and price history →

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.