NVIDIA RTX A2000 6GB vs NVIDIA A10G 24GB
The A10G delivers 4.4x the FP32 throughput of the RTX A2000 (35 vs 8 TFLOPS dense). The A10G also carries 18 GB more memory (24 GB vs 6 GB).
NVIDIA RTX A2000 6GB
Full specs →NVIDIA A10G 24GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The A10G is the newer part: Ampere, launched in 2022, against the RTX A2000's Ampere from 2021. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Dense throughput for the RTX A2000 against the A10G: FP32 8 vs 35 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 6 GB against 24 GB, fed at 288 GB/s versus 600 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 70 W for the RTX A2000 and 300 W for the A10G. At FP32 that works out to 0.11 against 0.12 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX A2000 faster than the A10G?
At FP32 precision the A10G reaches 35 TFLOPS dense against 8 TFLOPS for the RTX A2000. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the RTX A2000 or the A10G?
The A10G carries 24 GB of VRAM versus 6 GB for the RTX A2000. Memory bandwidth is 288 GB/s for the RTX A2000 and 600 GB/s for the A10G.
How much power do the RTX A2000 and the A10G draw?
The RTX A2000 is rated at 70 W TDP and the A10G at 300 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the A10G is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.