NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16GB vs NVIDIA GB200 Grace Blackwell Superchip 372GB
The GB200 delivers 9.4x the FP32 throughput of the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (160 vs 17 TFLOPS dense). The GB200 also carries 356 GB more memory (372 GB vs 16 GB).
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16GB
Full specs →NVIDIA GB200 Grace Blackwell Superchip 372GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer part: Blackwell, launched in 2025, against the GB200's Blackwell from 2024. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Dense throughput for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell against the GB200: FP32 17 vs 160 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 16 GB against 372 GB, fed at 288 GB/s versus 16.0 TB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell faster than the GB200?
At FP32 precision the GB200 reaches 160 TFLOPS dense against 17 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or the GB200?
The GB200 carries 372 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. Memory bandwidth is 288 GB/s for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and 16.0 TB/s for the GB200.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.