Intel Arc Pro B65 32GB vs Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
The Arc Pro B65 and the Arc Pro B60 deliver near-identical FP32 throughput (12 vs 12 TFLOPS dense). The Arc Pro B65 also carries 8 GB more memory (32 GB vs 24 GB).
Intel Arc Pro B65 32GB
Full specs →Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The Arc Pro B65 is the newer part: Battlemage, launched in 2026, against the Arc Pro B60's Battlemage from 2025. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Dense throughput for the Arc Pro B65 against the Arc Pro B60: FP32 12 vs 12 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 32 GB against 24 GB, fed at 608 GB/s versus 456 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 200 W for the Arc Pro B65 and 200 W for the Arc Pro B60. At FP32 that works out to 0.06 against 0.06 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro B65 faster than the Arc Pro B60?
They are close on paper: both deliver about 12 TFLOPS of dense FP32 throughput. Memory, bandwidth, and power are the deciding differences.
Which has more memory, the Arc Pro B65 or the Arc Pro B60?
The Arc Pro B65 carries 32 GB of VRAM versus 24 GB for the Arc Pro B60. Memory bandwidth is 608 GB/s for the Arc Pro B65 and 456 GB/s for the Arc Pro B60.
How much power do the Arc Pro B65 and the Arc Pro B60 draw?
The Arc Pro B65 is rated at 200 W TDP and the Arc Pro B60 at 200 W.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.