Intel Arc Pro B70 32GB vs Intel Arc Pro B65 32GB
The Arc Pro B70 delivers 87% more FP32 throughput than the Arc Pro B65 (23 vs 12 TFLOPS dense).
Intel Arc Pro B70 32GB
Full specs →Intel Arc Pro B65 32GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2026: the Arc Pro B70 on Battlemage and the Arc Pro B65 on Battlemage.
Dense throughput for the Arc Pro B70 against the Arc Pro B65: FP32 23 vs 12 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 32 GB against 32 GB, fed at 608 GB/s versus 608 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 230 W for the Arc Pro B70 and 200 W for the Arc Pro B65. At FP32 that works out to 0.10 against 0.06 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro B70 faster than the Arc Pro B65?
At FP32 precision the Arc Pro B70 reaches 23 TFLOPS dense against 12 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B65. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Arc Pro B70 or the Arc Pro B65?
Both GPUs carry 32 GB of VRAM. Memory bandwidth is 608 GB/s for the Arc Pro B70 and 608 GB/s for the Arc Pro B65.
How much power do the Arc Pro B70 and the Arc Pro B65 draw?
The Arc Pro B70 is rated at 230 W TDP and the Arc Pro B65 at 200 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc Pro B70 is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.