NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell delivers 70% more FP8 throughput than the Jetson AGX Thor (878 vs 517 TFLOPS dense). The Jetson AGX Thor counters with 32 GB more memory (128 GB vs 96 GB).

Jetson AGX Thor: Blackwell, 2025 RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: Blackwell, 2025
FP8 dense lead
+70%
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: 878 vs 517 TFLOPS
VRAM
128 vs 96 GB
32 GB more for the Jetson AGX Thor
Bandwidth
273 GB/s vs 1.8 TB/s
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell moves data faster
TDP
130 W vs 300 W
Jetson AGX Thor draws 170 W less

Specifications

Jetson AGX Thor
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
Architecture
BlackwellBlackwell
Launch Year
20252025
Form Factor
ModulePCIe
VRAM
128 GB96 GB
Memory Bandwidth
273 GB/s1.8 TB/s
TDP
130 W300 W
Process Node
4nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Jetson AGX Thor
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
FP64
No verified data available1.7 TFlops
FP32
8.1 TFlops 109.7 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available219.5 TFlops
438.9 TFLOPS sparse
BF16
No verified data available438.9 TFlops
877.9 TFLOPS sparse
FP16
No verified data available438.9 TFlops
877.9 TFLOPS sparse
FP8
517.0 TFlops
1035.0 TFLOPS sparse
877.9 TFlops
1755.7 TFLOPS sparse
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
1035.0 TFlops
2070.0 TFLOPS sparse
1755.7 TFlops
3511.4 TFLOPS sparse
INT8
517.0 TFlops
1035.0 TOPS sparse
877.9 TFlops
1755.7 TOPS sparse

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

Both GPUs launched in 2025: the Jetson AGX Thor on Blackwell and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on Blackwell.

Dense throughput for the Jetson AGX Thor against the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: FP32 8.1 vs 110 TFLOPS, FP8 517 vs 878 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 128 GB against 96 GB, fed at 273 GB/s versus 1.8 TB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 130 W for the Jetson AGX Thor and 300 W for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. At FP32 that works out to 0.06 against 0.37 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Jetson AGX Thor faster than the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?

At FP8 precision the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell reaches 878 TFLOPS dense against 517 TFLOPS for the Jetson AGX Thor. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the Jetson AGX Thor or the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?

The Jetson AGX Thor carries 128 GB of VRAM versus 96 GB for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. Memory bandwidth is 273 GB/s for the Jetson AGX Thor and 1.8 TB/s for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

How much power do the Jetson AGX Thor and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell draw?

The Jetson AGX Thor is rated at 130 W TDP and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 300 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the more efficient part.

Can I rent the Jetson AGX Thor or the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell in the cloud?

Yes. Live cloud listings tracked by Flopper start at $0.50 per GPU hour. The rental pricing section on this page lists current providers and rates for both GPUs.

Where to Rent

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
RunPod
1× RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition $0.50 1h ago View →
Vast.ai
1× RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition Community $1.02 1h ago View →
RunPod
1× RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition Community $1.64 1h ago View →
All RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell listings and price history →

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.