NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64GB

The Jetson AGX Thor delivers 52% more FP32 throughput than the Jetson AGX Orin (8.1 vs 5.3 TFLOPS dense). The Jetson AGX Thor also carries 64 GB more memory (128 GB vs 64 GB).

Jetson AGX Thor: Blackwell, 2025 Jetson AGX Orin: Ampere, 2021
FP32 dense lead
+52%
Jetson AGX Thor: 8.1 vs 5.3 TFLOPS
VRAM
128 vs 64 GB
64 GB more for the Jetson AGX Thor
Bandwidth
273 GB/s vs 205 GB/s
Jetson AGX Thor moves data faster
TDP
130 W vs 60 W
Jetson AGX Orin draws 70 W less

Specifications

Jetson AGX Thor
Jetson AGX Orin
Architecture
BlackwellAmpere
Launch Year
20252021
Form Factor
ModuleModule
VRAM
128 GB64 GB
Memory Bandwidth
273 GB/s205 GB/s
TDP
130 W60 W
Process Node

Performance (TFLOPS)

Jetson AGX Thor
Jetson AGX Orin
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
8.1 TFlops 5.3 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
No verified data available43.0 TFlops
85.0 TFLOPS sparse
FP8
517.0 TFlops
1035.0 TFLOPS sparse
No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
1035.0 TFlops
2070.0 TFLOPS sparse
No verified data available
INT8
517.0 TFlops
1035.0 TOPS sparse
85.0 TFlops
170.0 TOPS sparse

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Jetson AGX Thor is the newer part: Blackwell, launched in 2025, against the Jetson AGX Orin's Ampere from 2021. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Dense throughput for the Jetson AGX Thor against the Jetson AGX Orin: FP32 8.1 vs 5.3 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 128 GB against 64 GB, fed at 273 GB/s versus 205 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 130 W for the Jetson AGX Thor and 60 W for the Jetson AGX Orin. At FP32 that works out to 0.06 against 0.09 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Jetson AGX Thor faster than the Jetson AGX Orin?

At FP32 precision the Jetson AGX Thor reaches 8.1 TFLOPS dense against 5.3 TFLOPS for the Jetson AGX Orin. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the Jetson AGX Thor or the Jetson AGX Orin?

The Jetson AGX Thor carries 128 GB of VRAM versus 64 GB for the Jetson AGX Orin. Memory bandwidth is 273 GB/s for the Jetson AGX Thor and 205 GB/s for the Jetson AGX Orin.

How much power do the Jetson AGX Thor and the Jetson AGX Orin draw?

The Jetson AGX Thor is rated at 130 W TDP and the Jetson AGX Orin at 60 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Jetson AGX Orin is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.