Tenstorrent Wormhole n300d vs Tenstorrent Wormhole n300s
The Wormhole n300d and the Wormhole n300s deliver near-identical FP8 throughput (466 vs 466 TFLOPS dense).
Tenstorrent Wormhole n300d
Full specs →Tenstorrent Wormhole n300s
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2024: the Wormhole n300d on Wormhole and the Wormhole n300s on Wormhole.
Dense throughput for the Wormhole n300d against the Wormhole n300s: FP16 131 vs 131 TFLOPS, FP8 466 vs 466 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 24 GB against 24 GB, fed at 576 GB/s versus 576 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Wormhole n300d faster than the Wormhole n300s?
They are close on paper: both deliver about 466 TFLOPS of dense FP8 throughput. Memory, bandwidth, and power are the deciding differences.
Which has more memory, the Wormhole n300d or the Wormhole n300s?
Both GPUs carry 24 GB of VRAM. Memory bandwidth is 576 GB/s for the Wormhole n300d and 576 GB/s for the Wormhole n300s.
How much power do the Wormhole n300d and the Wormhole n300s draw?
The Wormhole n300d is rated at 300 W TDP and the Wormhole n300s at 300 W.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.