Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB vs Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
The Arc Pro B60 delivers 15% more FP32 throughput than the Arc Pro B50 (12 vs 11 TFLOPS dense). The Arc Pro B60 also carries 8 GB more memory (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB
Full specs →Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2025: the Arc Pro B50 on Battlemage and the Arc Pro B60 on Battlemage.
Dense throughput for the Arc Pro B50 against the Arc Pro B60: FP32 11 vs 12 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 16 GB against 24 GB, fed at 224 GB/s versus 456 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 70 W for the Arc Pro B50 and 200 W for the Arc Pro B60. At FP32 that works out to 0.15 against 0.06 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc Pro B50 faster than the Arc Pro B60?
At FP32 precision the Arc Pro B60 reaches 12 TFLOPS dense against 11 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B50. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Arc Pro B50 or the Arc Pro B60?
The Arc Pro B60 carries 24 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB for the Arc Pro B50. Memory bandwidth is 224 GB/s for the Arc Pro B50 and 456 GB/s for the Arc Pro B60.
How much power do the Arc Pro B50 and the Arc Pro B60 draw?
The Arc Pro B50 is rated at 70 W TDP and the Arc Pro B60 at 200 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc Pro B50 is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.