AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 48GB vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot delivers 19% more FP16 throughput than the Radeon RX 7900 XT (123 vs 103 TFLOPS dense). The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot also carries 28 GB more memory (48 GB vs 20 GB).

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: RDNA 3, 2024 Radeon RX 7900 XT: RDNA 3, 2022
FP16 dense lead
+19%
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: 123 vs 103 TFLOPS
VRAM
48 vs 20 GB
28 GB more for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Bandwidth
864 GB/s vs 800 GB/s
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot moves data faster
TDP
295 W vs 315 W
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 20 W less

Specifications

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Architecture
RDNA 3RDNA 3
Launch Year
20242022
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
VRAM
48 GB20 GB
Memory Bandwidth
864 GB/s800 GB/s
TDP
295 W315 W
Process Node
5nm5nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon RX 7900 XT
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
61.3 TFlops 51.6 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
123.0 TFlops 103.2 TFlops
FP8
No verified data available No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
123.0 TFlops 103.2 TFlops

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer part: RDNA 3, launched in 2024, against the Radeon RX 7900 XT's RDNA 3 from 2022. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Dense throughput for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot against the Radeon RX 7900 XT: FP32 61 vs 52 TFLOPS, FP16 123 vs 103 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 48 GB against 20 GB, fed at 864 GB/s versus 800 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 295 W for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 315 W for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. At FP32 that works out to 0.21 against 0.16 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot faster than the Radeon RX 7900 XT?

At FP16 precision the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 123 TFLOPS dense against 103 TFLOPS for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot or the Radeon RX 7900 XT?

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 48 GB of VRAM versus 20 GB for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. Memory bandwidth is 864 GB/s for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and 800 GB/s for the Radeon RX 7900 XT.

How much power do the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and the Radeon RX 7900 XT draw?

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is rated at 295 W TDP and the Radeon RX 7900 XT at 315 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.