Graphcore C600 vs Graphcore Bow IPU
The Bow IPU delivers 25% more FP16 throughput than the C600 (350 vs 280 TFLOPS dense).

Graphcore C600
Full specs →
Graphcore Bow IPU
Full specs →Specifications




Performance (TFLOPS)




FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2022: the C600 on Colossus MK2 and the Bow IPU on Colossus MK2.
Dense throughput for the C600 against the Bow IPU: FP16 280 vs 350 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the C600 faster than the Bow IPU?
At FP16 precision the Bow IPU reaches 350 TFLOPS dense against 280 TFLOPS for the C600. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.