Huawei Atlas 300V vs Huawei Ascend 910A
The Ascend 910A delivers 5.1x the FP16 throughput of the Atlas 300V (256 vs 50 TFLOPS dense). The Ascend 910A also carries 8 GB more memory (32 GB vs 24 GB).
Huawei Atlas 300V
Full specs →Huawei Ascend 910A
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The Atlas 300V is the newer part: Da Vinci, launched in 2022, against the Ascend 910A's Da Vinci from 2019. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Dense throughput for the Atlas 300V against the Ascend 910A: FP16 50 vs 256 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 24 GB against 32 GB, fed at 205 GB/s versus 1.2 TB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Atlas 300V faster than the Ascend 910A?
At FP16 precision the Ascend 910A reaches 256 TFLOPS dense against 50 TFLOPS for the Atlas 300V. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Atlas 300V or the Ascend 910A?
The Ascend 910A carries 32 GB of memory versus 24 GB for the Atlas 300V. Memory bandwidth is 205 GB/s for the Atlas 300V and 1.2 TB/s for the Ascend 910A.
How much power do the Atlas 300V and the Ascend 910A draw?
The Atlas 300V is rated at 72 W TDP and the Ascend 910A at 310 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Ascend 910A is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.