Intel Arc A310 4GB vs Intel Arc A770 16GB

Side-by-side specifications, performance, and rental pricing for datacenter AI workloads.

Arc A310: Alchemist, 2022 Arc A770: Alchemist, 2022
VRAM
4 vs 16 GB
12 GB more for the Arc A770
Bandwidth
124 GB/s vs 560 GB/s
Arc A770 moves data faster
TDP
75 W vs 225 W
Arc A310 draws 150 W less

Specifications

Arc A310
Arc A770
Architecture
AlchemistAlchemist
Launch Year
20222022
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
VRAM
4 GB16 GB
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s560 GB/s
TDP
75 W225 W
Process Node
6nm6nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Arc A310
Arc A770
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
No verified data available19.7 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
No verified data available39.4 TFlops
FP8
No verified data available No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
52.0 TFlops 262.0 TFlops

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

Both GPUs launched in 2022: the Arc A310 on Alchemist and the Arc A770 on Alchemist.

Memory is 4 GB against 16 GB, fed at 124 GB/s versus 560 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more memory, the Arc A310 or the Arc A770?

The Arc A770 carries 16 GB of VRAM versus 4 GB for the Arc A310. Memory bandwidth is 124 GB/s for the Arc A310 and 560 GB/s for the Arc A770.

How much power do the Arc A310 and the Arc A770 draw?

The Arc A310 is rated at 75 W TDP and the Arc A770 at 225 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc A770 is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.