Intel Arc B570 10GB vs Intel Arc Pro B65 32GB

Side-by-side specifications, performance, and rental pricing for datacenter AI workloads.

Arc B570: Battlemage, 2024 Arc Pro B65: Battlemage, 2026
VRAM
10 vs 32 GB
22 GB more for the Arc Pro B65
Bandwidth
380 GB/s vs 608 GB/s
Arc Pro B65 moves data faster
TDP
150 W vs 200 W
Arc B570 draws 50 W less

Specifications

Arc B570
Arc Pro B65
Architecture
BattlemageBattlemage
Launch Year
20242026
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
VRAM
10 GB32 GB
Memory Bandwidth
380 GB/s608 GB/s
TDP
150 W200 W
Process Node
5nm5nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Arc B570
Arc Pro B65
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
No verified data available12.3 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP8
No verified data available No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
203.0 TFlops 197.0 TFlops

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Arc Pro B65 is the newer part: Battlemage, launched in 2026, against the Arc B570's Battlemage from 2024. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Memory is 10 GB against 32 GB, fed at 380 GB/s versus 608 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more memory, the Arc B570 or the Arc Pro B65?

The Arc Pro B65 carries 32 GB of VRAM versus 10 GB for the Arc B570. Memory bandwidth is 380 GB/s for the Arc B570 and 608 GB/s for the Arc Pro B65.

How much power do the Arc B570 and the Arc Pro B65 draw?

The Arc B570 is rated at 150 W TDP and the Arc Pro B65 at 200 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc Pro B65 is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.