- Home
- Compare GPUs
- Kunlunxin R200-8F vs Kunlunxin R200
Kunlunxin R200-8F vs Kunlunxin R200
Side-by-side comparison of specifications, performance, and efficiency.
KU
Kunlunxin R200-8F
Architecture
XPU-R
VRAM
32 GB
TDP
160 W
KU
Kunlunxin R200
Architecture
XPU-R
VRAM
16 GB
TDP
150 W
Specifications
Kunlunxin R200-8F Kunlunxin R200
Architecture
XPU-R XPU-R
Launch Year
— —
Form Factor
PCIe PCIe
VRAM
32 GB16 GB
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s512 GB/s
TDP
160 W150 W
Process Node
7nm 7nm
| Spec | Kunlunxin R200-8F | Kunlunxin R200 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | XPU-R | XPU-R |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Form Factor | PCIe | PCIe |
| VRAM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| TDP | 160 W | 150 W |
| Process Node | 7nm | 7nm |
Performance (TFLOPS)
Kunlunxin R200-8F Kunlunxin R200
FP32
32.0 TFlops32.0 TFlops
FP16
128.0 TFlops128.0 TFlops
INT8
256.0 TFlops256.0 TFlops
| Precision | Kunlunxin R200-8F | Kunlunxin R200 |
|---|---|---|
| FP32 | 32.0 TFlops | 32.0 TFlops |
| FP16 | 128.0 TFlops | 128.0 TFlops |
| INT8 | 256.0 TFlops | 256.0 TFlops |
FLOPS by Precision
Efficiency — TDP vs FP32 Performance
Analysis
Most Efficient
Kunlunxin
R200
0.21 TFLOPS/W
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.