Meta MTIA 200 vs Meta MTIA 300
The MTIA 300 delivers 3.4x the BF16 throughput of the MTIA 200 (600 vs 177 TFLOPS dense). The MTIA 300 also carries 88 GB more memory (216 GB vs 128 GB).
Meta MTIA 200
Full specs →Meta MTIA 300
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
The MTIA 300 is the newer part: MTIA, launched in 2026, against the MTIA 200's MTIA from 2024. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.
Memory is 128 GB against 216 GB, fed at 205 GB/s versus 6.1 TB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the MTIA 200 faster than the MTIA 300?
At BF16 precision the MTIA 300 reaches 600 TFLOPS dense against 177 TFLOPS for the MTIA 200. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the MTIA 200 or the MTIA 300?
The MTIA 300 carries 216 GB of memory versus 128 GB for the MTIA 200. Memory bandwidth is 205 GB/s for the MTIA 200 and 6.1 TB/s for the MTIA 300.
How much power do the MTIA 200 and the MTIA 300 draw?
The MTIA 200 is rated at 90 W TDP and the MTIA 300 at 800 W.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.