NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 48GB

The RTX 6000 Ada delivers 5.1x the FP8 throughput of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (729 vs 142 TFLOPS dense). The RTX 6000 Ada also carries 36 GB more memory (48 GB vs 12 GB).

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: Ada Lovelace, 2024 RTX 6000 Ada: Ada Lovelace, 2023
FP8 dense lead
5.1x
RTX 6000 Ada: 729 vs 142 TFLOPS
VRAM
12 vs 48 GB
36 GB more for the RTX 6000 Ada
TDP
220 W vs 300 W
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 80 W less

Specifications

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
RTX 6000 Ada
Architecture
Ada LovelaceAda Lovelace
Launch Year
20242023
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
VRAM
12 GB48 GB
Memory Bandwidth
960 GB/s
TDP
220 W300 W
Process Node
4nm4nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
RTX 6000 Ada
FP64
0.6 TFlops No verified data available
FP32
35.5 TFlops 91.1 TFlops
TF32
35.5 TFlops
sparse not published
No verified data available
BF16
71.0 TFlops
sparse not published
No verified data available
FP16
71.0 TFlops
sparse not published
No verified data available
FP8
141.9 TFlops
sparse not published
728.5 TFlops
1457.0 TFLOPS sparse
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
283.9 TFlops
sparse not published
No verified data available

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer part: Ada Lovelace, launched in 2024, against the RTX 6000 Ada's Ada Lovelace from 2023. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Dense throughput for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER against the RTX 6000 Ada: FP32 35 vs 91 TFLOPS, FP8 142 vs 729 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 12 GB against 48 GB. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 220 W for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and 300 W for the RTX 6000 Ada. At FP32 that works out to 0.16 against 0.30 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER faster than the RTX 6000 Ada?

At FP8 precision the RTX 6000 Ada reaches 729 TFLOPS dense against 142 TFLOPS for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER or the RTX 6000 Ada?

The RTX 6000 Ada carries 48 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER.

How much power do the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the RTX 6000 Ada draw?

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is rated at 220 W TDP and the RTX 6000 Ada at 300 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the RTX 6000 Ada is the more efficient part.

Can I rent the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER or the RTX 6000 Ada in the cloud?

Yes. Live cloud listings tracked by Flopper start at $0.07 per GPU hour. The rental pricing section on this page lists current providers and rates for both GPUs.

Where to Rent

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
Vast.ai
4× GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB Community $0.07 1h ago View →
All GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER listings and price history →

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 48GB

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
Vast.ai
4× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB Community $0.49 1h ago View →
DataCrunch
1× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB Spot $0.52 1h ago View →
RunPod
1× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB Community $0.74 1h ago View →
RunPod
1× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB $0.84 1h ago View →
Massed Compute
4× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB $0.97 1h ago View →
DataCrunch
1× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB $1.04 1h ago View →
AceCloud
1× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB $1.14 1h ago View →
DigitalOcean
1× RTX 6000 Ada 48GB $1.57 1h ago View →
All RTX 6000 Ada listings and price history →

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.