NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada 16GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada 48GB

The RTX 5880 Ada delivers 11.5x the FP8 throughput of the RTX 2000 Ada (554 vs 48 TFLOPS dense). The RTX 5880 Ada also carries 32 GB more memory (48 GB vs 16 GB).

RTX 2000 Ada: Ada Lovelace, 2024 RTX 5880 Ada: Ada Lovelace, 2024
FP8 dense lead
11.5x
RTX 5880 Ada: 554 vs 48 TFLOPS
Memory
16 vs 48 GB
32 GB more for the RTX 5880 Ada
Bandwidth
224 GB/s vs 960 GB/s
RTX 5880 Ada moves data faster
TDP
70 W vs 285 W
RTX 2000 Ada draws 215 W less
See rental pricing from $0.24/hr Download comparison sheet

Share this page

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada 16GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada 48GB

A post with this link shows the card on the Image tab as its preview.

Printable version →

Specifications

RTX 2000 Ada
RTX 5880 Ada
Architecture
Ada LovelaceAda Lovelace
Launch Year
20242024
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
Memory
16 GB48 GB
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s960 GB/s
TDP
70 W285 W
Process Node
4nm4nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

RTX 2000 Ada
RTX 5880 Ada
FP64
0.2 TFLOPS No verified data available
FP32
12 TFLOPS 69 TFLOPS
TF32
12 TFLOPS
sparse not published
No verified data available
BF16
24 TFLOPS
sparse not published
No verified data available
FP16
24 TFLOPS
sparse not published
No verified data available
FP8
48 TFLOPS
sparse not published
554 TFLOPS
1,108 TFLOPS sparse
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
48 TOPS
sparse not published
No verified data available

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

Both GPUs launched in 2024: the RTX 2000 Ada on Ada Lovelace and the RTX 5880 Ada on Ada Lovelace.

Dense throughput for the RTX 2000 Ada against the RTX 5880 Ada: FP32 12 vs 69 TFLOPS, FP8 48 vs 554 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 16 GB against 48 GB, fed at 224 GB/s versus 960 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 70 W for the RTX 2000 Ada and 285 W for the RTX 5880 Ada. At FP32 that works out to 0.17 against 0.24 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RTX 2000 Ada faster than the RTX 5880 Ada?

At FP8 precision the RTX 5880 Ada reaches 554 TFLOPS dense against 48 TFLOPS for the RTX 2000 Ada. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the RTX 2000 Ada or the RTX 5880 Ada?

The RTX 5880 Ada carries 48 GB of memory versus 16 GB for the RTX 2000 Ada. Memory bandwidth is 224 GB/s for the RTX 2000 Ada and 960 GB/s for the RTX 5880 Ada.

How much power do the RTX 2000 Ada and the RTX 5880 Ada draw?

The RTX 2000 Ada is rated at 70 W TDP and the RTX 5880 Ada at 285 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the RTX 5880 Ada is the more efficient part.

Can I rent the RTX 2000 Ada or the RTX 5880 Ada in the cloud?

Yes. Live cloud listings tracked by Flopper start at $0.24 per GPU hour. The rental pricing section on this page lists current providers and rates for both GPUs.

Where to Rent

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada 16GB

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
1× RTX 2000 Ada 16GB $0.24 just now View →
GPU.ai
1× RTX 2000 Ada 16GB $0.24 just now View →
1× RTX 2000 Ada 16GB Community $0.50 just now View →
All RTX 2000 Ada listings and price history →

NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada 48GB

ProviderConfigurationPrice/GPU-hrChecked
2× RTX 5880 Ada 48GB Community $0.67 just now View →
All RTX 5880 Ada listings and price history →

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.

© 2026 Flopper.io - Compare the GPUs Powering AI