NVIDIA Rubin CPX vs NVIDIA Vera Rubin Superchip

Side-by-side specifications, performance, and rental pricing for datacenter AI workloads.

Rubin CPX: Rubin, 2026 Vera Rubin: Rubin, 2026
Memory
128 vs 576 GB
448 GB more for the Vera Rubin
Download comparison sheet

Share this page

NVIDIA Rubin CPX vs NVIDIA Vera Rubin Superchip

A post with this link shows the card on the Image tab as its preview.

Printable version →

Specifications

Rubin CPX
Vera Rubin
Architecture
RubinRubin
Launch Year
20262026
Form Factor
—Superchip
Memory
128 GB576 GB
Memory Bandwidth
—44.0 TB/s
TDP
——
Process Node
——

Performance (TFLOPS)

Rubin CPX
Vera Rubin
FP64
No verified data available67 TFLOPS
FP32
No verified data available260 TFLOPS
TF32
No verified data available4,000 TFLOPS
sparse not published
BF16
No verified data available8,000 TFLOPS
sparse not published
FP16
No verified data available8,000 TFLOPS
sparse not published
FP8
No verified data available35,000 TFLOPS
sparse not published
FP6
No verified data available35,000 TFLOPS
sparse not published
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
No verified data available500 TOPS
sparse not published
Tensor Core
FP64 (TC)
No verified data available400 TFLOPS

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

Both GPUs launched in 2026: the Rubin CPX on Rubin and the Vera Rubin on Rubin.

Memory is 128 GB against 576 GB. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more memory, the Rubin CPX or the Vera Rubin?

The Vera Rubin carries 576 GB of memory versus 128 GB for the Rubin CPX.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.

© 2026 Flopper.io - Compare the GPUs Powering AI