AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Radeon 8060S (Strix Halo) vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 Radeon 8050S (Strix Halo)
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 delivers 29% more FP32 throughput than the Ryzen AI Max 385 (30 vs 23 TFLOPS dense).
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Radeon 8060S (Strix Halo)
Full specs →AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 Radeon 8050S (Strix Halo)
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2025: the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 on RDNA 3.5 and the Ryzen AI Max 385 on RDNA 3.5.
Dense throughput for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 against the Ryzen AI Max 385: FP32 30 vs 23 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 128 GB against 128 GB, fed at 256 GB/s versus 256 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 55 W for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and 55 W for the Ryzen AI Max 385. At FP32 that works out to 0.54 against 0.42 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 faster than the Ryzen AI Max 385?
At FP32 precision the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 reaches 30 TFLOPS dense against 23 TFLOPS for the Ryzen AI Max 385. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or the Ryzen AI Max 385?
Both GPUs carry 128 GB of VRAM. Memory bandwidth is 256 GB/s for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and 256 GB/s for the Ryzen AI Max 385.
How much power do the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the Ryzen AI Max 385 draw?
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is rated at 55 W TDP and the Ryzen AI Max 385 at 55 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.