Huawei logo

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Huawei Ascend 950PR

The Ascend 910C delivers 60% more FP16 throughput than the Ascend 950PR (800 vs 500 TFLOPS dense).

Ascend 910C: Da Vinci v2 (dual-die), 2025 Ascend 950PR: Da Vinci v3, 2026
FP16 dense lead
+60%
Ascend 910C: 800 vs 500 TFLOPS
Memory
128 vs 128 GB
Same capacity
Bandwidth
3.2 TB/s vs 1.6 TB/s
Ascend 910C moves data faster
TDP
600 W vs 900 W
Ascend 910C draws 300 W less
Download comparison sheet

Share this page

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Huawei Ascend 950PR

A post with this link shows the card on the Image tab as its preview.

Printable version →
Huawei logo

Huawei Ascend 910C

Leads on FP16 Full specs →

What is the Huawei Ascend 910C?

The Ascend 910C is an NPU from Huawei on the Da Vinci v2 (dual-die) architecture, an accelerator built for AI inference. It is an OAM module, the open accelerator format used in multi-GPU servers. Ascend 910C full specifications →

Can I rent the Ascend 910C in the cloud?

Flopper is not tracking any live rental listings for the Ascend 910C yet. The provider directory lists the clouds that rent comparable accelerators on demand. GPU cloud providers →

How does the Ascend 910C compare with other accelerators?

This page sets the Ascend 910C against the Ascend 950PR. The Ascend 910C is the older generation of the two. Both are Huawei parts, and both ship as an OAM module, so they fit the same class of system. The compare tool builds the same comparison for any two parts in the catalogue. All GPU comparisons →

Where do the Ascend 910C figures come from?

Every Ascend 910C figure on this page traces to Huawei's own datasheet or specification table. How Flopper verifies specifications →

Huawei logo

Huawei Ascend 950PR

Full specs →

What is the Huawei Ascend 950PR?

The Ascend 950PR is an NPU from Huawei on the Da Vinci v3 architecture, an accelerator built for AI inference. It is an OAM module, the open accelerator format used in multi-GPU servers. Ascend 950PR full specifications →

Can I rent the Ascend 950PR in the cloud?

Flopper is not tracking any live rental listings for the Ascend 950PR yet. The provider directory lists the clouds that rent comparable accelerators on demand. GPU cloud providers →

How does the Ascend 950PR compare with other accelerators?

This page sets the Ascend 950PR against the Ascend 910C. The Ascend 950PR is the newer generation of the two. Both are Huawei parts, and both ship as an OAM module, so they fit the same class of system. The compare tool builds the same comparison for any two parts in the catalogue. All GPU comparisons →

Where do the Ascend 950PR figures come from?

Huawei published the Ascend 950PR figures in marketing material rather than a datasheet, and Flopper has no independent confirmation of them. How Flopper verifies specifications →

Specifications

Huawei logo
Ascend 910C
Huawei logo
Ascend 950PR
Architecture
Da Vinci v2 (dual-die)Da Vinci v3
Launch Year
20252026
Form Factor
OAMOAM
Memory
128 GB128 GB
Memory Bandwidth
3.2 TB/s1.6 TB/s
TDP
600 W900 W
Process Node
SMIC 7nm—

Performance (TFLOPS)

Huawei logo
Ascend 910C
Huawei logo
Ascend 950PR
No verified data available No verified data available
50 TFLOPS No verified data available
No verified data available No verified data available
800 TFLOPS 500 TFLOPS
800 TFLOPS 500 TFLOPS
No verified data available1,000 TFLOPS
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
No verified data available2,000 TFLOPS
1,600 TOPS No verified data available

Figures are dense. Where a vendor publishes a figure it sits under the dense one and never decides a winner. Hover any precision for its definition, or read the GPU glossary.

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Ascend 950PR is the newer part: Da Vinci v3 (2026) against the Ascend 910C's Da Vinci v2 (dual-die) (2025).

Both carry 128 GB of memory. Bandwidth is 3.2 TB/s against 1.6 TB/s, which sets the ceiling on decode speed.

Power is 600 W against 900 W, and at FP32 the Ascend 910C does more work per watt. Weight the FP8 and FP16 rows for LLM work and the FP64 row for HPC.

New to the terms? The glossary explains FP32, BF16, FP16, FP8, FP4, INT8, Sparsity and TFLOPS.

Frequently asked questions

What is better, the Ascend 910C or the Ascend 950PR?

The Ascend 910C, on throughput. At FP16 precision the Ascend 910C reaches 800 TFLOPS dense against 500 TFLOPS for the Ascend 950PR. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which should you choose, the Ascend 910C or the Ascend 950PR?

Choose the Ascend 910C for training and high-throughput inference: it has 60% more FP16 throughput than the Ascend 950PR. The Ascend 910C draws 300 W less power, which matters in an air-cooled or power-capped rack.

Which has more memory, the Ascend 910C or the Ascend 950PR?

Both GPUs carry 128 GB of memory. Memory bandwidth is 3.2 TB/s for the Ascend 910C and 1.6 TB/s for the Ascend 950PR.

How much power do the Ascend 910C and the Ascend 950PR draw?

The Ascend 910C is rated at 600 W TDP and the Ascend 950PR at 900 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Ascend 910C is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.

© 2026 Flopper.io - Compare the GPUs Powering AI