Intel Arc B580 12GB vs Intel Arc Pro B65 32GB

Side-by-side specifications, performance, and rental pricing for datacenter AI workloads.

Arc B580: Battlemage, 2024 Arc Pro B65: Battlemage, 2026
VRAM
12 vs 32 GB
20 GB more for the Arc Pro B65
Bandwidth
456 GB/s vs 608 GB/s
Arc Pro B65 moves data faster
TDP
190 W vs 200 W
Arc B580 draws 10 W less

Specifications

Arc B580
Arc Pro B65
Architecture
BattlemageBattlemage
Launch Year
20242026
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
VRAM
12 GB32 GB
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s608 GB/s
TDP
190 W200 W
Process Node
5nm5nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Arc B580
Arc Pro B65
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
No verified data available12.3 TFlops
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP8
No verified data available No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
No verified data available No verified data available
INT8
233.0 TFlops 197.0 TFlops

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Arc Pro B65 is the newer part: Battlemage, launched in 2026, against the Arc B580's Battlemage from 2024. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Memory is 12 GB against 32 GB, fed at 456 GB/s versus 608 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more memory, the Arc B580 or the Arc Pro B65?

The Arc Pro B65 carries 32 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB for the Arc B580. Memory bandwidth is 456 GB/s for the Arc B580 and 608 GB/s for the Arc Pro B65.

How much power do the Arc B580 and the Arc Pro B65 draw?

The Arc B580 is rated at 190 W TDP and the Arc Pro B65 at 200 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Arc Pro B65 is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.