Flopper.io Flopper.io
Kunlunxin logo

Kunlunxin R200 vs Kunlunxin R200-8F

The R200 and the R200-8F deliver near-identical FP16 throughput (128 vs 128 TFLOPS dense). The R200-8F also carries 16 GB more memory (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Memory
16 vs 32 GB
16 GB more for the R200-8F
Bandwidth
512 GB/s vs 512 GB/s
Even
TDP
150 W vs 160 W
R200 draws 10 W less
Download comparison sheet

Share this page

Kunlunxin R200 vs Kunlunxin R200-8F

A post with this link shows the card on the Image tab as its preview.

Post on X Share on LinkedIn
 Printable version →
Kunlunxin logo

Kunlunxin R200

Full specs →

What is the Kunlunxin R200?

The R200 is an NPU from Kunlunxin on the XPU-R architecture, an accelerator built for AI inference. It is a PCIe add-in card, so it fits standard servers and workstations. R200 full specifications →

Can I rent the R200 in the cloud?

Flopper is not tracking any live rental listings for the R200 yet. The provider directory lists the clouds that rent comparable accelerators on demand. GPU cloud providers →

How does the R200 compare with other accelerators?

This page sets the R200 against the R200-8F. Both are Kunlunxin parts, and both ship as a PCIe card, so they fit the same class of system. The compare tool builds the same comparison for any two parts in the catalogue. All GPU comparisons →

Where do the R200 figures come from?

Every R200 figure on this page traces to Kunlunxin's own datasheet or specification table. How Flopper verifies specifications →

Kunlunxin logo

Kunlunxin R200-8F

Full specs →

What is the Kunlunxin R200-8F?

The R200-8F is an NPU from Kunlunxin on the XPU-R architecture, an accelerator built for AI inference. It is a PCIe add-in card, so it fits standard servers and workstations. R200-8F full specifications →

Can I rent the R200-8F in the cloud?

Flopper is not tracking any live rental listings for the R200-8F yet. The provider directory lists the clouds that rent comparable accelerators on demand. GPU cloud providers →

How does the R200-8F compare with other accelerators?

This page sets the R200-8F against the R200. Both are Kunlunxin parts, and both ship as a PCIe card, so they fit the same class of system. The compare tool builds the same comparison for any two parts in the catalogue. All GPU comparisons →

Where do the R200-8F figures come from?

Every R200-8F figure on this page traces to Kunlunxin's own datasheet or specification table. How Flopper verifies specifications →

Specifications

Kunlunxin logo
R200
Kunlunxin logo
R200-8F
Architecture
XPU-RXPU-R
Launch Year
——
Form Factor
PCIePCIe
Memory
16 GB32 GB
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s512 GB/s
TDP
150 W160 W
Process Node
7nm7nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Kunlunxin logo
R200
Kunlunxin logo
R200-8F
No verified data available No verified data available
32 TFLOPS 32 TFLOPS
No verified data available No verified data available
No verified data available No verified data available
128 TFLOPS 128 TFLOPS
No verified data available No verified data available
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
No verified data available No verified data available
256 TOPS 256 TOPS

Figures are dense. Where a vendor publishes a figure it sits under the dense one and never decides a winner. Hover any precision for its definition, or read the GPU glossary.

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The R200-8F carries 16 GB more memory (32 GB against 16 GB), so larger models fit on one GPU before you shard. Bandwidth is 512 GB/s against 512 GB/s, which sets the ceiling on decode speed.

Power is 150 W against 160 W, and at FP32 the R200 does more work per watt. Weight the FP8 and FP16 rows for LLM work and the FP64 row for HPC.

New to the terms? The glossary explains FP32, FP16, INT8, Sparsity and TFLOPS.

Frequently asked questions

Is the R200 faster than the R200-8F?

They are close on paper: both deliver about 128 TFLOPS of dense FP16 throughput. Memory, bandwidth, and power are the deciding differences.

Which should you choose, the R200 or the R200-8F?

On raw FP16 throughput the R200 and the R200-8F are level, so the decision rests on memory, power and price. Choose the R200-8F when the model has to fit on one GPU: it carries 16 GB more memory. The R200 draws 10 W less power, which matters in an air-cooled or power-capped rack.

Which has more memory, the R200 or the R200-8F?

The R200-8F carries 32 GB of memory versus 16 GB for the R200. Memory bandwidth is 512 GB/s for the R200 and 512 GB/s for the R200-8F.

How much power do the R200 and the R200-8F draw?

The R200 is rated at 150 W TDP and the R200-8F at 160 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the R200 is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.

Open in Full Compare Tool → R200 full specs R200-8F full specs Estimate cluster cost in the calculator →

© 2026 Flopper.io - Compare the GPUs Powering AI