Meta logo vs

Meta MTIA 200 vs NVIDIA L40 48GB

The MTIA 200 and the L40 deliver near-identical FP16 throughput (181 vs 177 TFLOPS dense). The MTIA 200 also carries 80 GB more memory (128 GB vs 48 GB).

MTIA 200: MTIA, 2024 L40: Ada Lovelace, 2023
Memory
128 vs 48 GB
80 GB more for the MTIA 200
Bandwidth
205 GB/s vs 864 GB/s
L40 moves data faster
TDP
90 W vs 300 W
MTIA 200 draws 210 W less
See rental pricing from $0.69/hr Download comparison sheet

Share this page

Meta MTIA 200 vs NVIDIA L40 48GB

A post with this link shows the card on the Image tab as its preview.

Printable version →
Meta logo

Meta MTIA 200

Full specs →

What is the Meta MTIA 200?

The MTIA 200 is an ASIC from Meta on the MTIA architecture, an accelerator built for AI workloads. MTIA 200 full specifications →

Can I rent the MTIA 200 in the cloud?

Flopper is not tracking any live rental listings for the MTIA 200 yet. The provider directory lists the clouds that rent comparable accelerators on demand. GPU cloud providers →

How does the MTIA 200 compare with other accelerators?

This page sets the MTIA 200 against the L40. The MTIA 200 is the newer generation of the two. This is a cross-vendor matchup, Meta against NVIDIA. Flopper also compares it head to head with the MTIA 100 and MTIA 300, across every published precision, memory and power. MTIA 200 vs MTIA 100 →

Where do the MTIA 200 figures come from?

Every MTIA 200 figure on this page traces to Meta's own datasheet or specification table. How Flopper verifies specifications →

NVIDIA L40 48GB

Full specs →

What is the NVIDIA L40?

The L40 is a GPU from NVIDIA on the Ada Lovelace architecture, an accelerator for AI training, inference and high-performance computing. It is a PCIe add-in card, so it fits standard servers and workstations. L40 full specifications →

Can I rent the L40 in the cloud?

Yes. Cloud providers tracked by Flopper rent the L40 by the hour, and the pricing page compares their current rates and the price history side by side. L40 rental prices →

How does the L40 compare with other accelerators?

This page sets the L40 against the MTIA 200. The L40 is the older generation of the two. This is a cross-vendor matchup, NVIDIA against Meta. The compare tool builds the same comparison for any two parts in the catalogue. All GPU comparisons →

Where do the L40 figures come from?

Every L40 figure on this page traces to NVIDIA's own datasheet or specification table. How Flopper verifies specifications →

Specifications

Meta logo
MTIA 200
L40
Architecture
MTIAAda Lovelace
Launch Year
20242023
Form Factor
—PCIe
Memory
128 GB48 GB
Memory Bandwidth
205 GB/s864 GB/s
TDP
90 W300 W
Process Node
5nm4nm

Performance (TFLOPS)

Meta logo
MTIA 200
L40
No verified data available No verified data available
No verified data available91 TFLOPS
No verified data available91 TFLOPS
181 TFLOPS sparse
177 TFLOPS
354 TFLOPS sparse
181 TFLOPS
362 TFLOPS sparse
177 TFLOPS
354 TFLOPS sparse
181 TFLOPS
362 TFLOPS sparse
No verified data available362 TFLOPS
724 TFLOPS sparse
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
No verified data available No verified data available
354 TOPS
708 TOPS sparse
362 TOPS
724 TOPS sparse

Figures are dense. Where a vendor publishes a figure it sits under the dense one and never decides a winner. Hover any precision for its definition, or read the GPU glossary.

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The MTIA 200 is the newer part: MTIA (2024) against the L40's Ada Lovelace (2023).

The MTIA 200 carries 80 GB more memory (128 GB against 48 GB), so larger models fit on one GPU before you shard. Bandwidth is 205 GB/s against 864 GB/s, which sets the ceiling on decode speed.

Power is 90 W against 300 W, and at FP32 the L40 does more work per watt. Weight the FP8 and FP16 rows for LLM work and the FP64 row for HPC.

New to the terms? The glossary explains FP32, TF32, BF16, FP16, FP8, INT8, Sparsity and TFLOPS. For how the generations relate, see NVIDIA architectures explained.

Frequently asked questions

Is the MTIA 200 faster than the L40?

They are close on paper: both deliver about 181 TFLOPS of dense FP16 throughput. Memory, bandwidth, and power are the deciding differences.

Which should you choose, the MTIA 200 or the L40?

On raw FP16 throughput the MTIA 200 and the L40 are level, so the decision rests on memory, power and price. Choose the MTIA 200 when the model has to fit on one GPU: it carries 80 GB more memory. The MTIA 200 draws 210 W less power, which matters in an air-cooled or power-capped rack.

Which has more memory, the MTIA 200 or the L40?

The MTIA 200 carries 128 GB of memory versus 48 GB for the L40. Memory bandwidth is 205 GB/s for the MTIA 200 and 864 GB/s for the L40.

How much power do the MTIA 200 and the L40 draw?

The MTIA 200 is rated at 90 W TDP and the L40 at 300 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the L40 is the more efficient part.

How much do the MTIA 200 and the L40 cost to rent?

Live cloud listings tracked by Flopper price no live listings yet for the MTIA 200, and the L40 from $0.69 per GPU-hour across 8 providers. The rental section on this page links to every provider, rate and the price history for each GPU.

Where to Rent

Meta logo

Meta MTIA 200

No live rental listings tracked for the MTIA 200 yet.

Browse GPU cloud providers

NVIDIA L40 48GB

Rent from

$0.69 / GPU-hr

Lowest of 16 live listings across 8 providers · median $0.94

See all L40 rental prices →

Price history and every provider on the pricing page. Some links are affiliate links.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.

© 2026 Flopper.io - Compare the GPUs Powering AI