NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB

The Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB delivers 72% more FP8 throughput than the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB (517 vs 300 TFLOPS dense). The Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB also carries 64 GB more memory (128 GB vs 64 GB).

Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB: Blackwell, 2025 Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB: Blackwell, 2026
FP8 dense lead
+72%
Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB: 517 vs 300 TFLOPS
Memory
128 vs 64 GB
64 GB more for the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB
Bandwidth
273 GB/s vs 273 GB/s
Even
TDP
130 W vs 90 W
Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB draws 40 W less

Specifications

Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB
Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB
Architecture
BlackwellBlackwell
Launch Year
20252026
Form Factor
ModuleModule
Memory
128 GB64 GB
Memory Bandwidth
273 GB/s273 GB/s
TDP
130 W90 W
Process Node
——

Performance (TFLOPS)

Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB
Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB
FP64
No verified data available No verified data available
FP32
8.1 TFLOPS 4.7 TFLOPS
TF32
No verified data available No verified data available
BF16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP16
No verified data available No verified data available
FP8
517 TFLOPS
1,035 TFLOPS sparse
300 TFLOPS
600 TFLOPS sparse
FP6
No verified data available No verified data available
FP4
1,035 TFLOPS
2,070 TFLOPS sparse
600 TFLOPS
1,200 TFLOPS sparse
INT8
517 TOPS
1,035 TOPS sparse
300 TOPS
600 TOPS sparse

FLOPS by Precision

What actually differs

The Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB is the newer part: Blackwell, launched in 2026, against the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB's Blackwell from 2025. Newer architectures typically add lower-precision formats and better throughput per watt, so check the precision rows your workload actually uses.

Dense throughput for the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB against the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB: FP32 8.1 vs 4.7 TFLOPS, FP8 517 vs 300 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.

Memory is 128 GB against 64 GB, fed at 273 GB/s versus 273 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.

Power budgets are 130 W for the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB and 90 W for the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB. At FP32 that works out to 0.06 against 0.05 TFLOPS per watt.

For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB faster than the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB?

At FP8 precision the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB reaches 517 TFLOPS dense against 300 TFLOPS for the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.

Which has more memory, the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB or the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB?

The Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB carries 128 GB of memory versus 64 GB for the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB. Memory bandwidth is 273 GB/s for the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB and 273 GB/s for the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB.

How much power do the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB and the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB draw?

The Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB is rated at 130 W TDP and the Jetson AGX Thor T4000 64GB at 90 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Jetson AGX Thor T5000 128GB is the more efficient part.

Get Comparison Updates

New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.

© 2026 Flopper.io - Compare the GPUs Powering AI