AMD Radeon PRO W7700 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 16GB
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE delivers 63% more FP16 throughput than the Radeon PRO W7700 (92 vs 57 TFLOPS dense).
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 16GB
Full specs →AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 16GB
Full specs →Specifications
Performance (TFLOPS)
FLOPS by Precision
What actually differs
Both GPUs launched in 2023: the Radeon PRO W7700 on RDNA 3 and the Radeon RX 7900 GRE on RDNA 3.
Dense throughput for the Radeon PRO W7700 against the Radeon RX 7900 GRE: FP32 28 vs 46 TFLOPS, FP16 57 vs 92 TFLOPS. Sparse figures, where the vendor publishes them, appear under each dense number in the performance table.
Memory is 16 GB against 16 GB, fed at 576 GB/s versus 576 GB/s. More memory per GPU means larger models fit before you have to shard across cards, which often matters more than raw TFLOPS for inference.
Power budgets are 190 W for the Radeon PRO W7700 and 260 W for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE. At FP32 that works out to 0.15 against 0.18 TFLOPS per watt.
For LLM training and inference, weight the FP8 and FP16 rows and memory capacity most heavily. For scientific and HPC workloads, the FP64 row is the one to read.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Radeon PRO W7700 faster than the Radeon RX 7900 GRE?
At FP16 precision the Radeon RX 7900 GRE reaches 92 TFLOPS dense against 57 TFLOPS for the Radeon PRO W7700. The performance table on this page lists every published precision for both GPUs.
Which has more memory, the Radeon PRO W7700 or the Radeon RX 7900 GRE?
Both GPUs carry 16 GB of VRAM. Memory bandwidth is 576 GB/s for the Radeon PRO W7700 and 576 GB/s for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE.
How much power do the Radeon PRO W7700 and the Radeon RX 7900 GRE draw?
The Radeon PRO W7700 is rated at 190 W TDP and the Radeon RX 7900 GRE at 260 W. On FP32 throughput per watt, the Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the more efficient part.
Get Comparison Updates
New GPUs added weekly. Be the first to see how they compare.